Ensuring Coherence Between Services, Digital, Competition, and IP Protocols in the AfCFTA

The webinar series on E-Commerce, Trade and Development: Policy Frameworks in Africa brings together experts on digital trade and development, trade law, digital infrastructure and stakeholders from business and trade policy makers to explore how developing countries, particularly in Africa, can benefit from open and well-regulated digital services markets.

The first webinar focused on The Digital Protocol in the AfCFTA and the JSI on E-Commerce. The second of the series shed light on to what extent the services, digital, competition and intellectual property protocols in the AfCFTA constitute a coherent policy framework for the establishment of the African single digital market.

  • Services are among the sectors most affected by the digital revolution. Once digitized, services can be stored and transmitted over digital networks both within countries and across borders, easing the proximity burden of services. Although proximity is still essential for many services, advances in artificial intelligence (AI) keep expanding the set of tasks that can be codified and traded electronically. Hence, digital services are the most dynamic trading sector globally.

    As new opportunities for shipping services abroad opens, trade rules and regulations developed in a different era become ripe for revisions. The stabilized text of the Joint Statement Initiative (JSI) on e-commerce released July 26 2024 marks the first set of multilateral rules for digital trade. Against the backdrop of rising barriers to cross-border dataflows the JSI can be a timely backstop for further digital fragmentation. However, so far, the JSI focuses on trade facilitation measures, while leaving rules on cross-border data flows, data localization and source code for future negotiations.

    Meanwhile more than 100 regional trade agreements, including the African Continent Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA), have chapters on electronic commerce. These typically go deeper than the JSI and have provisions for cross-border data flows while protecting personal data as well as disciplines on data localization requirement and protection of source code.

    AfCFTA aims at creating a single services market through progressive liberalization as scheduled in specific commitments by sector and mode of supply.  Five priority services (business services, communication services, financial services, tourism services and transport services) are negotiated under phase I, all of them substantially affected by the digital revolution.

    The AfCFTA also includes a draft digital protocol, complimentary to the AU Digital Transformation strategy for Africa 2020 -30, a draft competition protocol and a protocol on intellectual property rights. The digital protocol aims at “establishing harmonized rules and common principles and standards that enable and support digital trade for sustainable and inclusive socio-economic development and the digital transformation of the continent”.

    The draft competition protocol has provisions on abuse of dominant positions by digital platforms designated as gatekeepers, while the intellectual property protocol explicitly aims at supporting intra-African trade, including services trade and digital trade.

    • The AfCFTA digital protocol emphasizes the importance of promoting local digital content and services. How could the services; competition; and intellectual property protocols support this objective?
    • Conversely, do you see any areas where there are conflicting objectives and interests in these protocols? How could they be resolved?

  • Panelists:
    Jonathan Klaaren is Professor of Law & Society at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa. He works in the areas of competition and regulation, the legal profession, migration and citizenship, and socio-legal studies. Editor of several volumes, his most recent sole-authored book is "From Prohibited Immigrants to Citizens: The Origins of Citizenship and Nationality in South Africa" (2017). Klaaren holds a PhD in sociology from Yale University and law degrees from Columbia (JD) and Wits (LLB). He served as Head/Dean of the Wits Law School from 2010 to 2013 and as Director of the School’s Mandela Institute from 2005 to 2007. In 2016, he served as an Acting Judge on the High Court of South Africa (South Gauteng).
    Kholofelo Kugler is Counsel at the Advisory Centre on WTO Law in Geneva, where she litigates and provides legal advice and training on WTO law. She was previously a PhD Fellow in the project Trade Law 4.0 at the University of Lucerne, Switzerland, researching digital economy and AI regulation issues. As an independent consultant, Kholofelo has advised and provided training on trade and digital trade issues, including as a legal consultant to the AfCFTA Secretariat in the AfCFTA Digital Trade Protocol negotiations. She also lectures international trade law, digital trade law, and African regional integration at academic and training institutions in Africa, the Caribbean, Europe, and the United States. She is admitted as an attorney in her native South Africa.
    Raymond Onuoha is a Technology Policy Scholar and Consultant. His work focuses on the institutional and policy challenges in the digital economy and technology innovation in developing countries, with a specialization on Africa. His expertise covers digital transformation and innovation, internet governance and standardization, digital trade, e-governance, digital public infrastructure (DPI), open data, data governance, telecommunications and AI policy. He works as a Research Consultant with think-tanks such as Research ICT Africa (RIA) and The Portulans Institute. Raymond is currently an AfOx Fellow at the University of Oxford; Open Fellow at The Weizenbaum Institute, Germany; and a Post-Doctoral Fellow at the Wits Institute for Social and Economic Research (WISER), South Africa.
    Moderator:
    Ingo Borchert is a Professor of Economics at the University of Sussex Business School, Deputy Director of the UK Trade Policy Observatory, and a member of the Leadership Team at the Centre for Inclusive Trade Policy (CITP). He served as an Economist at the World Bank, Washington DC, from 2008-2011. He co-created the global “Services Trade Policy Database”, now jointly published by the World Bank and the World Trade Organization, and the “International Trade and Production Database.” He has published in leading academic journals on the impact of services trade restrictions and on structural gravity modelling for services trade.